Drone footage raises questions about Israeli justification for deadly strike on Gaza journalists

drone images from gaza


From the Washington Post

On January 7th, an Israeli military missile strike targeted a car carrying four Palestinian journalists outside Khan Younis, in southern Gaza, killing two members of an Al Jazeera crew, Hamza Dahdouh and Mustafa Thuraya, along with their driver, and seriously wounding two freelance journalists. They were returning from documenting the aftermath of an earlier Israeli strike with a drone. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) justified the strike by claiming they targeted a “terrorist” operating a drone that posed a threat, and later alleged that Thuraya and Dahdouh were linked to Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad, respectively.

However, The Washington Post’s investigation, including analysis of drone footage recovered from the scene and interviews with witnesses and colleagues of the slain journalists, found no evidence to support the IDF’s claims. The drone footage showed no Israeli soldiers, aircraft, or military equipment in the area, contradicting the IDF’s assertion of an “immediate” threat. The report also highlighted that both journalists had previously passed through Israeli checkpoints, indicating that they were not known militants as claimed by the IDF. The IDF declined to provide further details or evidence to support their claims when pressed by The Washington Post.

“It’s not enough to say that we suspected them so we killed them,” – Irene Khan, the U.N. special rapporteur

The Washington Post’s rigorous investigation into the Israeli missile strike that ruthlessly killed Palestinian journalists casts a damning light on the Israel Defense Forces’ (IDF) purported justifications. By meticulously analyzing drone footage and gathering firsthand accounts from witnesses, the report forcefully dismantles the IDF’s narrative of targeting militants, exposing a glaring discrepancy between official claims and the stark reality. This stark revelation not only calls into question the IDF’s integrity but also spotlights the grave dangers that journalists confront in conflict zones, demanding unequivocal transparency and accountability from military entities to safeguard press freedom and journalists’ lives.

“The IDF’s justification for the strike fit ‘a pattern of responses that we identified even before this war,’” – Sherif Mansour, the Middle East and North Africa program coordinator for the Committee to Protect Journalists.

This harrowing episode serves as a stark reminder of the relentless risks faced by journalists as they navigate the chaos of war to deliver truth to the global audience. It vehemently underscores the imperative of enshrining protections for journalists amidst the horrors of conflict, asserting their indispensable role in shedding light on the grim truths of war. The outcry for justice in the wake of this tragedy amplifies the urgent call for an international stand against such acts of violence, emphasizing the non-negotiable right of journalists to report free from the shadow of persecution and death, and the essential need for their protection as pillars of democracy and heralds of truth.


  1. Washington Post article
  2. Loveluck, Louisa, Imogen Piper, Sarah Cahlan, Hajar Harb, and Hazem Balousha. "Article Title." The Washington Post, March 19, 2024.